“I turned out fine” is horrible rationale for education
Just because your education was exceptionally average doesn’t mean your kids’ has to be. “I went to traditional school and I turned out fine” is perhaps the most ludicrous defense that exists for education, and I’ll tell you why. “Fine” is the pasta primavera you’ll never order again. “Fine” is the lukewarm compliment from your husband that sends you racing back to your closet to change your outfit. In all other areas of life, “fine” is not good enough. But for whatever reason, “fine” is the apex of our educational expectations. I myself am a product of public school education (and yes, look, I turned out fine!), but that doesn’t mean I can’t ask questions, can’t raise my expectations. That’s why I’m writing to you today. To raise your expectations. Because “fine” is not the summit. It is the unremarkable plateau where we’ve set up camp and have forgotten there is an entire mountain left to climb. Just because something is normal doesn’t mean it’s optimal First, a question: why do we defend systems we know to be flawed? Simple. Because we grew up inside them. This is what cognitive scientist Dan Lortie calls the “apprenticeship of observation.” Thousands of hours spent in a classroom, absorbing the squeak of an expo marker, the clamor of lockers, the fluorescent glare of buzzing overhead lights. These experiences taught us more than just algebra or grammar — they taught us what school looks like, what education itself is meant to embody. But just because something is normal doesn’t mean it’s optimal. For example, homework. Believe it or not, homework is not an essential part of education — understanding a concept is. Homework is simply one mechanism to help students understand a concept. The tool, not the essence, if you will. But because homework was embedded so deeply into our school experience, we believe it to be an indispensable part of education. This is the trap of the familiar: believing what’s normal is what’s best. And that, my friends, simply isn’t true. Students at Alpha don’t do hours of homework each day. Why? They spend their afternoons applying what they’ve learned in real-time. It makes the knowledge stick better than a worksheet ever could. See? There are countless mechanisms to success. Aren’t you curious to know them? The mythology of school The tricky thing about school is that it’s not just a system, it’s a mythology. Think of all the movies that act as educational lore in American culture: The Breakfast Club, Mean Girls, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Dead Poets Society. Myths, as we know, are sticky. They cling to us, not because they are accurate, but because they are nostalgic and evocative. If I close my eyes right now, I can smell the hallways of my childhood — some strange concoction of lemon cleaning solution and sweaty gym shoes. I can hear the shrill squeal of the whistle at P.E., feel the splintery ridges beneath my desk where another student carved their name into the wood — permanent proof that TYLER WAS HERE. These are not memories of an efficient system. They are simply the relics of growing up. Beautiful relics, maybe. But mile-markers of a high-quality education? Certainly not. Maybe you feel pride in having “overcome the system.” I know I do. That doesn’t mean our kids have to endure the same struggles. Why do we enroll kids into a system we know they’ll have to overcome? Why not seek out a system that works with them, instead of against them? It’s a valid question that very few of us ask. Nostalgia is a powerful force, but it tends to romanticize the past. Education isn’t a rite of passage or a test of resilience. It is not trauma-bonding lore like the movies say. It is a tool to unlock our kids’ potential. And it’s time to start trying. The past is not a blueprint for the future. It is a culmination of valuable lessons — but what is a lesson worth if we don’t learn from it? I’ll let you answer that one. Status Quo Bias Read the full article here
Personalized learning doesn’t just raise the floor, it explodes the ceiling
And it’s more accessible than ever before. It’s 1847 in the maternity ward of Vienna General Hospital, where childbirth mortality rates are scary high — that is, until one physician named Ignaz Semmelweis makes a discovery that changes everything. He notices that one maternity ward, staffed by midwives, has significantly lower death rates than the ward run by professional doctors. So, he casts off all notions of the prevailing medical dogma of the time and instead, directs his full attention towards this single maternity ward. His discovery? Medical students were moving directly from performing autopsies to delivering babies — without washing their hands. The fix was simple. Wash your hands before treating every single patient. No exceptions. Just like that, mortality rates dropped almost 20%. And yes, this relates to education more than you think. Personalized attention begets transformative outcomes. One-on-one education has always been the most potent form of learning. Did you know that aristocrats refused to travel without their personal tutors? There is even a distinct connection between one-on-one tutoring and the creation of genius: Einstein had Max Talmud, Virginia Woolf had Janet Case, Mozart had his father — the list goes on. But somewhere along the way, we’ve lost the thread. Tutoring became an after-school program replete with SAT prep questions and bored kids perpetually eyeing the clock on the wall. I’d even venture to say that tutoring is now a negative thing. It’s an embarrassed confession, an admission of failure. “I have a tutor” is shorthand for “I’m not good enough.” How did we let this happen? The truth is, personalized learning works. It’s why we fall back on tutoring when classrooms fail. And it’s more than just intuition; it’s science. Educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom proved this decades ago in 1984 with his famous 2 Sigma Problem: students who received one-on-one tutoring performed two standard deviations better than their peers in conventional classrooms, outperforming 98% of their classmates. Two sigma! Twice as effective! graph from Learner Personalized education doubles learning efficacy for kids; and it’s been every educator’s dream to implement this everywhere for the last 200 years. But there’s been very little we could do about it. Most families can’t afford to pay for a tutor (much less their air fare), and it’s impossible to provide entire classrooms with a personalized curriculum. And even if that was possible, we’d be scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find 1) skilled-enough tutors, and 2) enough skilled-enough tutors. This is why Bloom’s 2 Sigma Problem is just that: a problem. Individualized education, while ideal, has never been feasible. Until now. AI makes personalized education for every kid possible Did you know that AI tutors are now more effective than Harvard professors? Not only do Harvard students learn more than twice as much with AI, they learn in less time with more motivation. You wouldn’t think it’s possible, but it is. And that’s just the beginning. Let’s look at some more numbers. On average, personalized education leads to: Read the full article here
How AI will transform education, from PreK to PhD
There has never been a better time to be five years old. I often get asked this question: “If AI knows everything, why should my kids learn anything at all? Isn’t education obsolete?” My answer is visceral and immediate: No, education will never be obsolete. It’s actually more important than ever. But it does need to adapt. Massively. A few times per century, some new technological invention drops from the sky and uproots life as we know it. Whether we like it or not, we’re thrust into a “new normal,” one that significantly disrupts the pattern of our daily lives. People once thought the Industrial Revolution was the end of the world. And in some ways, it felt like it. People were scared, uncertain, powerless. Thousands of jobs were lost. But in the long-term, hundreds of thousands of jobs were created. Now, for you and me, everyday tasks are glossed with an ease and convenience that previous generations could have never dreamed of. All we had to do was adapt. We did it again with the Internet. And again, with the iPhone. And we will do it again with AI. Because beneath newfangled gadgets and innovations and movements, the human spirit throbs like a persistent pulse. We fear, endure, adapt, innovate, create, then marvel at what we’ve done and how far we’ve come. Eventually, we look back and say, “How did we ever manage without this thing?” And the cycle repeats itself. The first 20 years of a person’s life no longer look anything like the experience of earlier generations. That may sound scary, but I promise you: there has never been a better time to be five years old. The five phases of education (as we know it) Let’s start with a quick look at how education works without AI. Learning happens in five phases: Pre-K to 3rd GradeKids set the foundation of their education. They learn the basics: letters, numbers, how to read and write. There’s a popular adage: “Until 3rd grade, kids learn to read. After 3rd grade, they read to learn.” 4th Grade to 12th GradeThese years are all about mastering a standardized curriculum. In the U.S., that’s Common Core and AP courses. The goal is to stuff kids’ heads with as much knowledge as possible. CollegeStudents begin to learn from seasoned experts. College classes are less about standardized test scores and more about domain expertise. For the first time, students can break away from generalized curriculum and dive deep into niche pockets of education: gothic literature, applied mathematics, biochemistry, the history of ancient Mayan civilization — you name it. Master’s ProgramsNow, students shift to becoming experts themselves. “School subjects” become “career goals.” Students are no longer concerned with pure consumption of knowledge, but the long-term execution and creation of it. PhD ProgramsFinally, the PhD shifts from mastering knowledge to creating it. Students officially break their “student” mold and step into the role of “inventor,” “creator,” and “industry expert.” As you know, this is an arduous, expensive formula that can span the length of decades. Certain things must happen to elicit certain outcomes. Creation requires mastery. You can’t expand a frontier if you don’t know the existing frontier like the back of your hand. The human knowledge graph is an intricate web of successes and failures, from caffeine-fueled all-nighters to heated debates with professors to actually being in the field, boots on the ground, testing, trying, experimenting, hypothesizing. Knowledge is the result of generations standing on the shoulders of giants. Example of a knowledge graph in the realm of philosophy And now, a new giant (albeit, artificial) has entered the scene. And it will significantly change learning as we know it. Sacrificing learning in the name of AI isn’t just defeatist, it’s destructive You and I both know that education isn’t just about learning or thinking; it’s about learning how to learn, thinking about how to think. Throwing up our hands and saying, “Well, there’s no point in learning if AI can do it all!” is a destructive mindset. It’s the path to unlocking “scary AI” — the kind of existential threat that takes over the world because we have allowed technology to use us and not the other way around. What most of us are not seeing is this: AI can help our kids accomplish things no generation before them has ever been able to do. It will fill their minds with more knowledge than ever before, faster than ever before. It will enable their minds to be the most interesting places in the world. Can you imagine? If your kids’ own ideas were more exciting than the brain rot of TikTok or the addictive slop of video games? A few years ago, AI couldn’t beat a third grader in a math test. Now it can beat most Master’s students. AIs today are on track to become experts in every single academic field. What AI cannot do is create new knowledge at the capability level of humans, especially in fields where it doesn’t have gigabytes of training data. And this is where humans can thrive. Four ways AI will transform education Our idea of education is this: twenty-five students, one teacher, everyone learning the same thing at the same pace at the same time. Some kids are bored and drooling, others are frustrated and struggling, and teachers are oversaturated with responsibility. Bell rings. Class dismissed. These days will soon be over. Here are the four integral ways AI will transform education. Read the full article here
Why traditional school is broken (and how we’re fixing it)
Our education manifesto. The greatest untapped resource on the planet isn’t nuclear energy or deep-sea minerals, genetic engineering or outer space exploration; it’s human potential. And what human has more potential than a child? You’d think we’d pour our best effort into educating them, exhausting all possible options. But we don’t. Most parents know more about the difference between the oat milk from Trader Joe’s and the oat milk from Whole Foods than they know about their own kids’ education. (Not an insult, just a fact.) And it’s why I’m writing to you today. To be clear, I don’t enjoy harping on the fact that conventional education is broken. There are too many rage-baiters and doomsdayers out there: “public school sucks!” or “save your kid from public school while you still can!” I am not one of them. That’s coming at the problem from the wrong angle. Parents shouldn’t have to ask, “What’s wrong with my kids’ school?” They should be asking, excitedly, “How good can my kids’ school really get? How high is high?” But to answer that, we have to first understand where we are. And to be honest, it’s not pretty. My goal is to give you the unvarnished truth of our education system as a whole, so you can start building your own opinion and making the best possible decision for your family. Let’s start from the beginning. 400 BCE: The golden age of personalized education For over 1,000 years, education was a deeply personalized experience. It was the golden age of tutors: Socrates tutored Plato, who tutored Aristotle, who tutored Alexander the Great. You get the picture. The problem was, only the wealthy could afford high-quality tutors. Personalized learning may have been the pinnacle of education, but it was far from accessible. Naturally, alternative solutions were born. Read the full article here
The six-hour school day is dead. Luckily, there’s an even better solution.
Welcome to two-hour learning, where kids learn twice as much, twice as fast. It’s true — kids can crush academics in just two hours a day. And by “crush,” I mean, climb their way to the top 1% of the nation. This isn’t hyperbole. It’s happening right now in the halls of our flagship school, Alpha. And your kids could be next. To ease the swell of panic that probably just rose in your throat — “you mean the newest, most successful form of education includes kids coming home after just two hours of school!?” — you should know that the “two hour” model only applies to hard and fast academics. (Yes. Take a breath. All is well.) It works like this: Mornings are for academics. Kids spend two hours immersed in deep, focused learning with traditional academia: math, reading, science, history. Afternoons are for life skills. Kids spend four hours participating in workshops that simulate real-world skills: public-speaking, entrepreneurship, creative writing, financial literacy. Kids aren’t built to sit butt-in-chair for six hours a day. Intuitively, we know this. They need movement and conversation, things to build and challenges to overcome. It’s frustrating enough for adults to be tethered to their desk all day. Why subject kids to the same fate? Why not fill their afternoons with activities that inspire them, that show them how the world actually works? Say, launching a food truck business, or writing a Broadway musical, rather than nodding off during post-lunch afternoon algebra. Kids are far more capable than we give them credit for, and the six hour school day keeps them shackled in these chains of unbelief. The two-hour learning model, however, gives kids precisely what they need — legitimate academia and real-world experience — precisely how they need it — action over absorption. Read the full article here
